Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a critical set of computational methods and engineered systems that support discovery across science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. While initially developed within computer science, AI applications are now widely utilized to achieve monumental advances across multiple domains, including:

1. Biology and Medicine: AI-based models have enabled real-time protein folding predictions that enhance drug discovery and precision healthcare.
2. Climate Science: Machine learning techniques have improved environmental modeling and long-term forecasting.
3. Materials Engineering: Computational algorithms have accelerated the design of alloys, polymers, and nanomaterials; and
4. Astrophysics: Large-scale data analysis methods support the interpretation of complex astronomical observations.

This paper examines the engineering foundations enabling AI-driven advancements. Relative emphasis was placed on the integral role of infrastructure, algorithm design, and governance frameworks in ensuring that AI applications remain scalable, ethical, and resilient. Current research indicates that AI-enabled engineering not only accelerates innovation but also redefines the competencies required for the future STEM workforce.

By addressing opportunities and challenges, including issues of data quality, bias, and regulatory oversight, this work positions AI’s influence across STEM as a paradigm shift with far-reaching implications. The analysis highlights the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration among engineers, scientists, and educators in navigating the ethical and societal complexities of AI integration, ensuring that innovation is both responsible and sustainable.

References

1. Abdar M., et al. “A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges”. Information Fusion 76 (2021): 243-297.
2. Amershi S., et al. “Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction”. CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019): 1-13.
3. Baxter G and Sommerville I. “Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering”. Interacting with Computers 23.1 (2011): 4-17.
4. Brewer W., et al. “Scalable Artificial Intelligence for Science: Perspectives, Methods and Exemplars”. arXiv:2406.17812 Computer Science, Machine Learning (2024).
5. Brynjolfsson E and McAfee A. “The Business of Artificial Intelligence”. Harvard Business Review (HBR) (2017). https://hbr.org/2017/07/the-business-of-artificial-intelligence
6. Butler KT., et al. “Machine Learning for Molecular and Materials Science”. Nature 559.7715 (2018): 547-555.
7. Dernis H., et al. “Identifying Artificial Intelligence Actors Using Online Data”. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2023/01 (2023). https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/identifying-artificial-intelligence-actors-using-online-data_1f5307e7-en.html
8. DeSantis MF. “Is AI a General Purpose Technology? (dissertation)”. Temple University Graduate Board, Philadelphia (2024).
9. Emery FE and Trist EL. “Management sciences, models and techniques”. In Proceedings of the sixth international meeting of the Institute of Management Science 2 (1960): 83-97.
10. Floridi L and Chiriatti M. “GPT?3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences”. Minds and Machines: Journal for Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy and Cognitive Science 30 (2020): 681-694.
11. Friedman B and Hendry DG. “Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination”. The MIT Press Direct (2019).
12. Gebru T., et al. “Datasheets for datasets”. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 64.12 (2021): 86-92.
13. Greenhalgh T., et al. “Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations”. The Milbank Quarterly 82.4 (2004a): 581-629.
14. Haibe-Kains B., et al. “Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence”. Nature 586.7829 (2020): 14-16.
15. Heaven WDD. “Hundreds of AI Tools Have Been Built to Catch COVID”. None Of Them Helped. MIT Technology Review (2021). https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/07/30/1030329/machine-learning-ai-failed-covid-hospital-diagnosis-pandemic/
16. Jumper J., et al. “Highly Accurate Protein Structure Prediction with AlphaFold”. Nature 596.7873 (2021): 583-589.
17. Keele University. “Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering”. Undertaking Systematic Reviews (2007).
18. Koh PW., et al. “WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts”. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR) 139 (2021): 5637-5664.
19. Mitchell M., et al. “Model Cards for Model Reporting”. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (2019): 220-229.
20. Nha Hong Q., et al. “The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018 for Information Professionals and Researchers”. Education for Information (2018a).
21. Ntampak M., et al. “A Deep Learning Approach to Galaxy Cluster X-ray Masses”. arXiv:1810.07703 (Astro-Ph) (2019).
22. Ntampaka M., et al. “The Role of Machine Learning in the Next Decade of Cosmology”. Cornell University: Astro2020 Science White Paper (2021).
23. Page MJ., et al. “The Prisma 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews”. BMJ 372.71 (2021).
24. Raji ID., et al. “Closing the AI accountability gap: defining an end-to-end framework for internal algorithmic auditing”. FAT* ’20: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (2020): 33-44.
25. Rao Dr AS, Verweij G and Cameron E. “Sizing the prize What’s the real value of AI for your business and how can you capitalise?”. PWC (2017). https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/analytics/assets/pwc-ai-analysis-sizing-the-prize-report.pdf
26. Rogers EM. “Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.)”. Free Press 2025 (2014). https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Diffusion-of-Innovations-5th-Edition/Everett-M-Rogers/9780743222099
27. Rolnick D., et al. “Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning”. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 55.2 (2022a): 1-96.
28. Rudin C. “Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead”. Nature Machine Intelligence 1.5 (2019): 206-215.
29. Schmidt J., et al. “Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science”. Npj Computational Materials 5.1 (2019).
30. Schneegans S, Straza T and Bello J. “UNESCO Science Report: The Race Against Time for Smarter Development”. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2021). https://www.unesco.org/reports/science/2021/en/download-report
31. Snyder H. “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines”. Journal of Business Research 104 (2019): 333-339.
32. Tunyasuvunakool K., et al. “Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human Proteome”. Nature 596.7873 (2021): 590-596.
33. Wasi AT, Eram EH and Mitu SA. “Generative AI as a Geopolitical Factor in Industry 5.0: Sovereignty, Access, and Control”. arXiv:2508.00973 Computer Science, Computers and Society (2025).
34. Zhavoronkov A, Vanhaelen Q and Oprea TI. “Will Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery Impact Clinical Pharmacology?”. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 107.4 (2020): 780-785.

Citation

Jada-Ann Riggins. “AI as a Catalyst Across STEM: Engineering the Next Era of Discovery". Clareus Scientific Science and Engineering 2.8 (2025): 08-18.

Copyright

© 2025 Jada-Ann Riggins. Licensee Clareus Scientific Publications. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.