/**/

Clareus Scientific Science and Engineering (ISSN: 3065-1182)

Research Article | Volume 2 Issue 2 - 2025

Compression and Decompression of Digital-Ink Handwriting Using Sparse Gaussian Process Regression and Dynamic Programming

Jinya Yano1 and Hiroyuki Fujioka2*
1Graduate School of Engineering, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Japan
2Department of Information Management, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, Japan

*Corresponding Author: Hiroyuki Fujioka, Department of Information Management, Fukuoka Institute of Technology, 3-30-1 Wajiro-Higashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 811-0295, Japan.

 February 14, 2025

DOI: 10.70012/CSSE.02.013

Abstract

This study addresses the challenges of compressing and decompressing digital-ink data captured from handwritten inputs on a device- such as pen-tablet, etc. We propose a novel method leveraging sparse Gaussian process regression (GPR) to compress digital-ink data into a compact kernel matrix using pseudo-inputs. To enhance compression accuracy and reconstruction fidelity, we integrate a dynamic programming (DP) strategy for optimal pseudo-input selection. Experimental results validate the proposed method by demonstrating its effectiveness and significant compression ratios.

Keywords: digital-ink; handwriting; compression; decompression; sparse Gaussian process regression; pseudo-inputs; optimal selection; dynamic programming

References

  1. G Kurtenbach. “Pen-based Computing, XRDS: Crossroads”. The ACM Magazine for Students-The Future of Interaction 16.4 (2010): 14-20.
  2. V Mazalov and S Watt. “Digital Ink Compression via Functional Approximation”. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, Kolkata, India (2010): 688-694.
  3. R Hu and S Watt. “Optimization of Point Selection on Digital Ink Curves”. Proc. 13th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, Bari, Italy (2012): 525-530.
  4. Y Mieno, H Fujioka and H Kano. “Data Compression of Digital-Ink with Pen-Slips Using Multi-level L1 Smoothing Splines”. Proc. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Hong Kong (2015): 1787-1792.
  5. R Tibshirani. “Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso”. J. of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 58.1 (1996): 267-288.
  6. SS Chen, DL Donoho and MA Saunders. “Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit”. SIAM Review 43.1 (2001): 129-159.
  7. M Aharon, M Elad and A Bruckstein. “The K-SVD: An algorithm for designing of overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representations”. IEEE Trans. Image Process 54-11 (2006): 4311-4322.
  8. CM Bishop. “Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning”. Springer (2006).
  9. E. Snelson and Z. Ghahramani. “Sparse Gaussian Process using Pseudo-inputs”. Neural Information Processing Systems 13. MIT Press (2006).
  10. GH Golub and CF Van Loan. “Matrix Computations: Johns Hopkins Studies in Mathematical Sciences”. Johns Hopkins University Press. 3rd edition (1996).
  11. TA Davis. “Direct Methods for Sparse Linear Systems (Fundamentals of Algorithms, Series Number 2)”. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2006).

Citation

Hiroyuki Fujioka., et al. “Compression and Decompression of Digital-Ink Handwriting Using Sparse Gaussian Process Regression and Dynamic Programming". Clareus Scientific Science and Engineering 2.2 (2025): 03-11.

Copyright

© 2025 Hiroyuki Fujioka., et al. Licensee Clareus Scientific Publications. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.